From November until just recently, singular yet disparate topics seemed to dominate much of the conversation surrounding two of my favorite topics, golf and marketing research. To the former, it seemed like everyone that I ran across either had an opinion on Tiger Woods or wanted to know mine. In the research world, the chatter abuzz was all about the potential for social media to become a reliable qualitative barometer for people's opinions and attitudes.
The team at Sports and Leisure Research Group decided to meld these two topics together. Utilizing some of the latest methodologies available to cull and analyze online conversations, we sought to track the magnitude and tonality of web conversation and opinion about Tiger Woods and see if it was consistent with attitudinal research that was part of our winter 2010 omnibus study. Recall that in the winter omnibus a national sample of nearly 1,000 golfers largely agreed that the rancor regarding the transgressions of golf's greatest player would dissipate significantly by the summer months. Our research tracked and analyzed online postings across over 1,100 different and relevant web sites from January of 2009 through mid March of 2010, right after Woods' public statement in February.
